| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
pambele
Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:53 am Post subject: Defining and non-defining clauses... |
|
|
Can anyone explain the difference in layman's terms?
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nikita Site Admin

Joined: 29 Apr 2004 Posts: 134
|
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:31 pm Post subject: Defining and Non-Defining Classes |
|
|
Hello,
In simple words about the defining and non-defining classes.
If you remove a non-defining clause (a kind of a smaller sentence that is a part of a bigger sentence), some information will be definitely lost, but it will still remain a normal and meaningful English sentence. This is because the clause does not define anything; it just provides some more information.
If you remove a defining clause from a sentence, the meaning will inevitably be lost.
Here are a few examples from Headway. You can easily see whether a noun is already clearly defined or not. If it is clearly defined, then we will most likely have a non-defining relative clause after it. Otherwise, the noun should be followed by a defining relative clause.
| Quote: | People _____ live longer. (Defining Relative Clause – what people?)
She married a man ____ (Defining Relative Clause – what man?)
Let me introduce you to Peter James (Non-defining. I don’t suppose you know many guys called Peter James.)
My great aunt Freda ____ is coming to lunch. (Non-defining. I have only one great aunt called Freda.)
|
And the full sentences from Headway.
| Quote: | People who do regular exercises live longer.
She married a man that she met on holiday in Turkey.
Let me introduce to Peter James, who works in our Paris office.
My great aunt Freda, who I was telling you about last night, is coming to lunch.
|
Any further questions are welcome.
By the way, there was once a discussion on defining & non-defining relative clauses at
http://eclecticenglish.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=26
You may find some stuff discussed there useful.
Cheerio!
Nikita |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nikita Site Admin

Joined: 29 Apr 2004 Posts: 134
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:30 pm Post subject: Re: Defining and Non-Defining Classes |
|
|
Hello again
What you also need to remember is that non-defining clauses are separated by commas, while defining clauses are not.
And here is another very good example from Headway.
| Quote: | I had a cocktail that was very unusual.
I had a cocktail which was very unusual. |
These two sentences have absolutely identical meanings.
| Quote: | | I had a cocktail, which was very unusual. |
In this sentence you have a non-defining relative clause, because there is a comma (,) followed by “which”. This sentence means that it was very unusual for me to have a cocktail. (Because normally I don’t touch alcohol or something like this.) By the way, only “which” in a non-defining relative clause can refer to the whole preceding sentence.
| Quote: | | I had a cocktail, that was very unusual. |
This sentence is obviously wrong, because you can never put “that” into a non-defining relative clause.
Give me a shout if you have any other questions.
Nikita |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pambele
Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks very much, Nikita. I kind of cracked it before I read your excellent posts, which just confirms things. Essentially, anything parenthetical requires commas and non-defining clauses are parenthetical remarks in a bigger clause.
Again, thank you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|